Add components
This commit is contained in:
260
slider/node_modules/eslint/lib/rules/no-fallthrough.js
generated
vendored
Normal file
260
slider/node_modules/eslint/lib/rules/no-fallthrough.js
generated
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @fileoverview Rule to flag fall-through cases in switch statements.
|
||||
* @author Matt DuVall <http://mattduvall.com/>
|
||||
*/
|
||||
"use strict";
|
||||
|
||||
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// Requirements
|
||||
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
const { directivesPattern } = require("../shared/directives");
|
||||
|
||||
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// Helpers
|
||||
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
const DEFAULT_FALLTHROUGH_COMMENT = /falls?\s?through/iu;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Checks all segments in a set and returns true if any are reachable.
|
||||
* @param {Set<CodePathSegment>} segments The segments to check.
|
||||
* @returns {boolean} True if any segment is reachable; false otherwise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
function isAnySegmentReachable(segments) {
|
||||
for (const segment of segments) {
|
||||
if (segment.reachable) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Checks whether or not a given comment string is really a fallthrough comment and not an ESLint directive.
|
||||
* @param {string} comment The comment string to check.
|
||||
* @param {RegExp} fallthroughCommentPattern The regular expression used for checking for fallthrough comments.
|
||||
* @returns {boolean} `true` if the comment string is truly a fallthrough comment.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
function isFallThroughComment(comment, fallthroughCommentPattern) {
|
||||
return (
|
||||
fallthroughCommentPattern.test(comment) &&
|
||||
!directivesPattern.test(comment.trim())
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Checks whether or not a given case has a fallthrough comment.
|
||||
* @param {ASTNode} caseWhichFallsThrough SwitchCase node which falls through.
|
||||
* @param {ASTNode} subsequentCase The case after caseWhichFallsThrough.
|
||||
* @param {RuleContext} context A rule context which stores comments.
|
||||
* @param {RegExp} fallthroughCommentPattern A pattern to match comment to.
|
||||
* @returns {null | object} the comment if the case has a valid fallthrough comment, otherwise null
|
||||
*/
|
||||
function getFallthroughComment(
|
||||
caseWhichFallsThrough,
|
||||
subsequentCase,
|
||||
context,
|
||||
fallthroughCommentPattern,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const sourceCode = context.sourceCode;
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
caseWhichFallsThrough.consequent.length === 1 &&
|
||||
caseWhichFallsThrough.consequent[0].type === "BlockStatement"
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const trailingCloseBrace = sourceCode.getLastToken(
|
||||
caseWhichFallsThrough.consequent[0],
|
||||
);
|
||||
const commentInBlock = sourceCode
|
||||
.getCommentsBefore(trailingCloseBrace)
|
||||
.pop();
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
commentInBlock &&
|
||||
isFallThroughComment(
|
||||
commentInBlock.value,
|
||||
fallthroughCommentPattern,
|
||||
)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return commentInBlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const comment = sourceCode.getCommentsBefore(subsequentCase).pop();
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
comment &&
|
||||
isFallThroughComment(comment.value, fallthroughCommentPattern)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return comment;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Checks whether a node and a token are separated by blank lines
|
||||
* @param {ASTNode} node The node to check
|
||||
* @param {Token} token The token to compare against
|
||||
* @returns {boolean} `true` if there are blank lines between node and token
|
||||
*/
|
||||
function hasBlankLinesBetween(node, token) {
|
||||
return token.loc.start.line > node.loc.end.line + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// Rule Definition
|
||||
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
/** @type {import('../types').Rule.RuleModule} */
|
||||
module.exports = {
|
||||
meta: {
|
||||
type: "problem",
|
||||
|
||||
defaultOptions: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
allowEmptyCase: false,
|
||||
reportUnusedFallthroughComment: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
docs: {
|
||||
description: "Disallow fallthrough of `case` statements",
|
||||
recommended: true,
|
||||
url: "https://eslint.org/docs/latest/rules/no-fallthrough",
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
schema: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
type: "object",
|
||||
properties: {
|
||||
commentPattern: {
|
||||
type: "string",
|
||||
},
|
||||
allowEmptyCase: {
|
||||
type: "boolean",
|
||||
},
|
||||
reportUnusedFallthroughComment: {
|
||||
type: "boolean",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
additionalProperties: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
messages: {
|
||||
unusedFallthroughComment:
|
||||
"Found a comment that would permit fallthrough, but case cannot fall through.",
|
||||
case: "Expected a 'break' statement before 'case'.",
|
||||
default: "Expected a 'break' statement before 'default'.",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
create(context) {
|
||||
const codePathSegments = [];
|
||||
let currentCodePathSegments = new Set();
|
||||
const sourceCode = context.sourceCode;
|
||||
const [
|
||||
{ allowEmptyCase, commentPattern, reportUnusedFallthroughComment },
|
||||
] = context.options;
|
||||
const fallthroughCommentPattern = commentPattern
|
||||
? new RegExp(commentPattern, "u")
|
||||
: DEFAULT_FALLTHROUGH_COMMENT;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We need to use leading comments of the next SwitchCase node because
|
||||
* trailing comments is wrong if semicolons are omitted.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
let previousCase = null;
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
onCodePathStart() {
|
||||
codePathSegments.push(currentCodePathSegments);
|
||||
currentCodePathSegments = new Set();
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
onCodePathEnd() {
|
||||
currentCodePathSegments = codePathSegments.pop();
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
onUnreachableCodePathSegmentStart(segment) {
|
||||
currentCodePathSegments.add(segment);
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
onUnreachableCodePathSegmentEnd(segment) {
|
||||
currentCodePathSegments.delete(segment);
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
onCodePathSegmentStart(segment) {
|
||||
currentCodePathSegments.add(segment);
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
onCodePathSegmentEnd(segment) {
|
||||
currentCodePathSegments.delete(segment);
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
SwitchCase(node) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Checks whether or not there is a fallthrough comment.
|
||||
* And reports the previous fallthrough node if that does not exist.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (previousCase && previousCase.node.parent === node.parent) {
|
||||
const previousCaseFallthroughComment =
|
||||
getFallthroughComment(
|
||||
previousCase.node,
|
||||
node,
|
||||
context,
|
||||
fallthroughCommentPattern,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
previousCase.isFallthrough &&
|
||||
!previousCaseFallthroughComment
|
||||
) {
|
||||
context.report({
|
||||
messageId: node.test ? "case" : "default",
|
||||
node,
|
||||
});
|
||||
} else if (
|
||||
reportUnusedFallthroughComment &&
|
||||
!previousCase.isSwitchExitReachable &&
|
||||
previousCaseFallthroughComment
|
||||
) {
|
||||
context.report({
|
||||
messageId: "unusedFallthroughComment",
|
||||
node: previousCaseFallthroughComment,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
previousCase = null;
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"SwitchCase:exit"(node) {
|
||||
const nextToken = sourceCode.getTokenAfter(node);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* `reachable` meant fall through because statements preceded by
|
||||
* `break`, `return`, or `throw` are unreachable.
|
||||
* And allows empty cases and the last case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const isSwitchExitReachable = isAnySegmentReachable(
|
||||
currentCodePathSegments,
|
||||
);
|
||||
const isFallthrough =
|
||||
isSwitchExitReachable &&
|
||||
(node.consequent.length > 0 ||
|
||||
(!allowEmptyCase &&
|
||||
hasBlankLinesBetween(node, nextToken))) &&
|
||||
node.parent.cases.at(-1) !== node;
|
||||
|
||||
previousCase = {
|
||||
node,
|
||||
isSwitchExitReachable,
|
||||
isFallthrough,
|
||||
};
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user