mirror of
https://github.com/janishutz/eth-summaries.git
synced 2026-07-27 21:29:09 +02:00
17 lines
965 B
TeX
17 lines
965 B
TeX
\subsection{Hash Index}
|
|
To measure the quality of \acrshort{ann} in comparison to \acrshort{knn}, we use $\texttt{recall@k} = |\texttt{ANN\_result} \cap \texttt{KNN\_result}| \div k$.
|
|
This however is not always a good metric, as two vastly different results, one objectively worse can score equally well.
|
|
|
|
Alternative methods mentioned are \texttt{RDE@k} and \texttt{TDK@k}, but not elaborated any further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsubsection{Performance vs Recall Trade-off}
|
|
This is a challenging task, primarily focusing on how many vectors we need to visit to achieve a user-specified target recall.
|
|
|
|
A few explored strategies are:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item \bi{Uniform autotuning for all queries}: Using learned offline models (e.g. Google CloudSQL VectorAssist)
|
|
\item \bi{Different for each query}: A model predicts the search effort parameters for each query or index
|
|
\item \bi{Adaptive}: Decide to continue or stop early based on the current search state
|
|
\end{itemize}
|